Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says

Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its best shot. With as much as date news and a small but lively 14 Billion criterion model, our AI is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to address mankind's hardest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pressing concerns that are less simple to pin down. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some appealing enhancements - research paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is actually on the smaller side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months earlier so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified area to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its reaction. While we have seen prediction improvements from our training, use these estimates for prop betting at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too personal for forum.pinoo.com.tr a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the crucial points from the short articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been helpful of his profession, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her loved ones to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.

Some fans are excited, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not addressing the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the chances and his actions suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low probability, perhaps around 5%, thinking about all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand just what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it seems like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the move. The short article discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to think about the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are mindful of the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they may change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number however possible given their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% opportunity. This accounts for trademarketclassifieds.com their preparation, self-confidence in the strategy, and the likelihood that they'll utilize it numerous times, particularly if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems substantial since it reveals he's done it before, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current posts, it mentions that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could mean he's less likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's likewise involved in a fight with Drake, which might give him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination match from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about consisting of any questionable songs in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he might still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel compelled to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements during the halftime show, so there's a danger that such material might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant carry on huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might give him more creative liberty. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could suggest he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the possibility seems to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the reality that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't mean to cause offense which he actually found it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for wiki.eqoarevival.com food, which recommends that he's a person who delights in consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 incredibly bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historic data that might influence this forecast.

First, I check out the posts offered. They all point out the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has come up more typically than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a huge distinction.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is usually considered random. The small historic edge for tails might be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I must think about whether this historical bias needs to affect the probability.

After considering it, I choose that while the historic data shows a small preference for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the probability far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists however does not override the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably think the same. BUT, its official now due to the fact that our AI says the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of short articles that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable calls in recent games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "ridiculous." They say there's no evidence of organized bias. That's a strong statement from the individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it might imply there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have actually been penalized more because 2022. That's interesting since if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate fewer penalties, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably very low. Maybe not zero since you can't rule out every possibility, but exceptionally unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth viewing the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.