Employment Discrimination Law in The United States

Employment discrimination law in the United States stems from the typical law, and is codified in numerous state, federal, and regional laws. These laws restrict discrimination based on certain characteristics or "safeguarded classifications". The United States Constitution likewise prohibits discrimination by federal and state federal governments versus their public staff members. Discrimination in the economic sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, however has ended up being subject to a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal law forbids discrimination in a number of locations, including recruiting, working with, task assessments, promo policies, training, compensation and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend protection to additional classifications or companies.

Under federal employment discrimination law, employers usually can not discriminate against employees on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual preference and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religion, [1] nationwide origin, [1] special needs (physical or psychological, including status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] insolvency or uncollectable bills, [9] hereditary details, [10] and citizenship status (for residents, permanent citizens, short-lived homeowners, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly address employment discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to secure federal government workers.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has an explicit requirement that the federal government does not deprive people of "life, liberty, or home", without due procedure of the law. It also consists of an implicit guarantee that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly forbids states from violating a person's rights of due process and equal protection. In the employment context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by dealing with employees, previous staff members, or task applicants unequally since of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure security requires that federal government workers have a reasonable procedural procedure before they are ended if the termination is associated with a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the provision that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination costs (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional since Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly provide their particular government the power to enact civil rights laws that use to the personal sector. The Federal government's authority to manage a private business, consisting of civil rights laws, comes from their power to regulate all commerce between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly pay for some defense from public and private work discrimination, employment such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only attend to prejudiced treatment by the federal government, including a public employer.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that manage the private sector are usually Constitutional under the "cops powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws created to safeguard public health, safety and morals. All States need to stick to the Federal Civil liberty laws, however States might enact civil liberties laws that offer additional employment protection.

For example, some State civil liberties laws use security from employment discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, although such types of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil rights laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has established over time.

The Equal Pay Act modified the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is imposed by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act forbids employers and unions from paying various wages based upon sex. It does not forbid other inequitable practices in working with. It supplies that where employees carry out equivalent operate in the corner requiring "equivalent ability, effort, and obligation and carried out under comparable working conditions," they should be provided equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to employers taken part in some element of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's employees if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a significant quantity of interstate commerce. [citation required]
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in a lot more elements of the work relationship. "Title VII developed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to a lot of employers engaged in interstate commerce with more than 15 workers, labor companies, and work companies. Title VII restricts discrimination based upon race, color, religion, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it unlawful for companies to discriminate based upon safeguarded attributes concerning terms, conditions, and benefits of employment. Employment service might not discriminate when hiring or referring candidates, and labor companies are also prohibited from basing subscription or union classifications on race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII in 1978, defining that illegal sex discrimination includes discrimination based upon pregnancy, childbirth, and associated medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "prohibits discrimination by federal specialists and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal specialists". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and modified in 1978 and 1986, prohibits companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The prohibited practices are almost similar to those outlined in Title VII, except that the ADEA safeguards employees in companies with 20 or more workers instead of 15 or more. A worker is secured from discrimination based upon age if he or she is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and forbade obligatory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise offer large pensions). The ADEA contains explicit standards for advantage, pension and retirement strategies. [7] Though ADEA is the center of most discussion of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history beginning with the abolishment of "maximum ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy versus age discrimination amongst federal specialists". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 restricts work discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal professionals with agreements of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal financial assistance. [16] It requires affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 requires affordable accommodation, and Section 508 needs that electronic and infotech be accessible to disabled workers. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 forbids discrimination by mine operators against miners who experience "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "needs affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam era veterans by federal contractors". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 forbids work discrimination on the basis of personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 forbids employers with more than 3 workers from victimizing anyone (other than an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to eliminate discriminatory barriers versus qualified individuals with disabilities, individuals with a record of a disability, or people who are considered having an impairment. It prohibits discrimination based on genuine or perceived physical or mental specials needs. It also needs companies to supply sensible accommodations to workers who require them since of a special needs to obtain a task, perform the important functions of a job, or enjoy the advantages and opportunities of work, unless the employer can show that unnecessary challenge will result. There are strict restrictions on when a company can ask disability-related concerns or require medical evaluations, and all medical information must be treated as private. A disability is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "significantly restricts one or more significant life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, changed in 1993, make sure all persons equivalent rights under the law and detail the damages offered to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from utilizing individuals' genetic details when making hiring, shooting, task positioning, or promotion choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not clearly consist of sexual orientation and 29 US states do not explicitly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids employment discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is included by the law's restriction of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work defenses for LGBT individuals were patchwork; numerous states and areas explicitly forbid harassment and bias in work decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public staff members. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzed Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC's figured out that transgender workers were secured under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the security to encompass sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have actually experienced some form of discrimination and harassment at the office. Moreover, a staggering 90 percent of transgender employees report some type of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Lots of people in the LGBT community have actually lost their task, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender lady who declares that her manager informed her that her presence might make other individuals feel uneasy. [26]
Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and private offices. A few more states ban LGBT discrimination in only public offices. [27] Some opponents of these laws believe that it would invade spiritual liberty, despite the fact that these laws are focused more on inequitable actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually also identified that these laws do not infringe complimentary speech or religious liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes likewise supply substantial protection from employment discrimination. Some laws extend similar protection as offered by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws provide higher defense to employees of the state or of state specialists.

The following table lists categories not safeguarded by federal law. Age is included as well, given that federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - enlisting, individual look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]
Government workers

Title VII likewise uses to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state federal governments have extra protections against employment discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not affect job efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually translated this as restricting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was announced that the analysis would be expanded to include gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public workers keep their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies can limitations workers' speech in particular ways. [93] Public workers retain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]
Federal employees who have work discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) should take legal action against in the correct federal jurisdiction, which postures a different set of issues for plaintiffs.

Exceptions

Authentic occupational credentials

Employers are usually enabled to consider attributes that would otherwise be discriminatory if they are bona fide occupational certifications (BFOQ). The most typical BFOQ is sex, and the second most common BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is demonstrated in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that police monitoring can match races when necessary. For example, if police are running operations that include private informants, or undercover representatives, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can think about race-based policing and hire officers that are proportional to the community's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not apply in the show business, such as casting for movies and tv. [95] Directors, producers and casting staff are allowed to cast characters based upon physical characteristics, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are uncommon in the show business, particularly in performers. [95] This reason is special to the home entertainment industry, and does not transfer to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, companies will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be an expense justification in wage spaces in between various groups of employees. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company needs to balance personal privacy and safety issues with the number of positions that a company are trying to fill. [96]
Additionally, consumer choice alone can not be a reason unless there is a personal privacy or safety defense. [96] For example, retail facilities in rural areas can not forbid African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the consumer base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that survivors of sexual assault is permitted.

If an employer were attempting to prove that work discrimination was based upon a BFOQ, there must be a factual basis for believing that all or considerably all members of a class would be unable to carry out the job safely and effectively or that it is unwise to figure out certifications on an individualized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a sinister motive does not transform a facially discriminatory policy into a neutral policy with a prejudiced impact. [97] Employers likewise bring the concern to show that a BFOQ is reasonably essential, and a lower inequitable option technique does not exist. [98]
Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating individuals in a different way in their work due to the fact that of their religion, their religions and practices, and/or their request for lodging (a modification in a work environment guideline or policy) of their faiths and practices. It likewise consists of dealing with people in a different way in their work because of their absence of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, companies are restricted from refusing to work with a specific based on their religion- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If an employee believes that they have actually experienced spiritual discrimination, they should resolve this to the supposed culprit. On the other hand, workers are protected by the law for reporting task discrimination and are able to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some places in the U.S. now have provisions that ban discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States give specific exemptions in these laws to services or institutions that are religious or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to varying degrees in different areas, depending on the setting and the context; a few of these have been supported and others reversed in time.

The most current and pervasive example of Religious Discrimination is the extensive rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many staff members are utilizing religions against altering the body and preventative medicine as a justification to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not enable employees to get religious exemptions, or decline their application may be charged by the worker with work discrimination on the basis of religions. However, there are particular requirements for staff members to present evidence that it is a genuinely held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 clearly allows discrimination versus members of the Communist Party.

Military

The military has actually faced criticism for forbiding females from serving in combat roles. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was modified to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the article published on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. discusses the way in which black males were dealt with in the military during the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites provided the African Americans a chance to show themselves as Americans by having them get involved in the war. The National Geographic website states, nevertheless, that when black soldiers joined the Navy, they were only allowed to work as servants; their participation was limited to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans desired to safeguard the nation they resided in, they were denied the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) safeguards the task rights of individuals who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or certain kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law also forbids companies from victimizing staff members for previous or present involvement or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer preference to veterans versus non-veterans has been alleged to enforce systemic disparate treatment of females due to the fact that there is a large underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has rejected this claim because there was no prejudiced intent towards females in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not straight discriminate versus a protected category might still be illegal if they produce a disparate impact on members of a protected group. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts employment practices that have a discriminatory impact, unless they are related to job performance.

The Act needs the elimination of artificial, approximate, and unneeded barriers to employment that operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to leave out Negroes can not be shown to be connected to job performance, it is forbidden, notwithstanding the employer's absence of prejudiced intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have been determined by the EEOC as having a disparate impact on nationwide origin minorities. [108]
When protecting against a diverse effect claim that declares age discrimination, an employer, however, does not need to show need; rather, it should merely show that its practice is affordable. [citation needed]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interprets and imposes the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement arrangements are consisted of in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its guidelines and standards are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to submit match under Title VII and/or the ADA need to tire their administrative solutions by submitting an administrative complaint with the EEOC prior to filing their claim in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs enforces Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which restricts discrimination against certified individuals with disabilities by federal specialists and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and imposes its own policies that apply to its own programs and to any entities that get financial help. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) implements the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which restricts discrimination based on citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces take the role of the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT work discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against persons with criminal records in the United States Racial wage gap in the United States Gender pay gap in the United States Criticism of credit scoring systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the Family Doctor. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination versus Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits workplace bias against gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the initial on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Tabulation, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful inequitable practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in specific activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Chief Law Officer|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the original on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or viewed HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment since of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Tabulation". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [long-term dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their hiring practices based upon a Bona Fide Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the initial on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare yourself for more US ladies in fight". CNN. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Job Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the initial on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the original on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut). - Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, a lawyer and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to secure older workers. Weak to start with, she specifies that the ADEA has been devitalized by the U.S. Supreme Court. - Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.