Employment Discrimination Law in The United States

Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the typical law, and is codified in various state, federal, and local laws. These laws forbid discrimination based upon certain qualities or "safeguarded classifications". The United States Constitution likewise forbids discrimination by federal and state federal governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the personal sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, however has actually become based on a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law prohibits discrimination in a number of locations, including recruiting, employing, job examinations, promotion policies, training, compensation and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend defense to additional categories or employers.

Under federal work discrimination law, employers generally can not discriminate against staff members on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] faith, [1] national origin, [1] disability (physical or mental, including status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or association, [8] insolvency or bad debts, [9] hereditary info, [10] and citizenship status (for people, permanent residents, short-term citizens, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly resolve work discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to secure federal civil servant.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and wiki.team-glisto.com state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or residential or commercial property", without due process of the law. It likewise includes an implicit guarantee that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from breaking a person's rights of due process and equal defense. In the employment context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by treating workers, former staff members, or job applicants unequally due to the fact that of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure defense needs that civil servant have a reasonable procedural procedure before they are terminated if the termination is associated with a "liberty" (such as the right to totally free speech) or home interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the clause that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional because Federal and loft.awardspace.info most State Constitutions do not specifically provide their respective government the power to enact civil liberties laws that apply to the economic sector. The Federal federal government's authority to regulate a personal company, including civil rights laws, stems from their power to manage all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically pay for some defense from public and personal work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions just address inequitable treatment by the government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that manage the economic sector are normally Constitutional under the "authorities powers" teaching or the power of a State to enact laws created to protect public health, safety and morals. All States should comply with the Federal Civil liberty laws, but States might enact civil rights laws that use extra work defense.

For instance, some State civil liberties laws use security from work discrimination on the basis of political association, even though such kinds of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil rights laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing work discrimination has established with time.

The Equal Pay Act modified the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits employers and unions from paying various wages based upon sex. It does not prohibit other discriminatory practices in employing. It provides that where workers carry out equal operate in the corner needing "equal skill, effort, and obligation and performed under similar working conditions," they ought to be supplied equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to employers taken part in some aspect of interstate commerce, or all of a company's employees if the business is engaged as a whole in a considerable amount of interstate commerce. [citation needed]
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in many more aspects of the work relationship. "Title VII created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to a lot of employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 workers, labor organizations, and employment firms. Title VII restricts discrimination based on race, color, religious beliefs, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it illegal for employers to discriminate based upon secured qualities relating to terms, conditions, and advantages of employment. Employment agencies may not discriminate when employing or referring applicants, and labor organizations are likewise restricted from basing membership or union categories on race, color, religion, users.atw.hu sex, or national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII in 1978, specifying that unlawful sex discrimination consists of discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "restricts discrimination by federal specialists and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal professionals". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and changed in 1978 and 1986, forbids companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The forbidden practices are almost similar to those laid out in Title VII, except that the ADEA secures workers in firms with 20 or more employees rather than 15 or more. A worker is secured from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has phased out and forbade necessary retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise provide big pensions). The ADEA includes explicit guidelines for benefit, pension and retirement strategies. [7] Though ADEA is the center of a lot of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into work in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "developed a policy versus age discrimination amongst federal specialists". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 forbids work discrimination on the basis of special needs by the federal government, federal contractors with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs receiving federal financial help. [16] It requires affirmative action as well as non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs sensible accommodation, and Section 508 requires that electronic and infotech be available to disabled workers. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 prohibits discrimination by mine operators against miners who suffer from "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "needs affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam era veterans by federal specialists". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 restricts work discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or uncollectable bills. [9]
The Immigration Reform and classifieds.ocala-news.com Control Act of 1986 restricts companies with more than 3 employees from victimizing anyone (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to get rid of inequitable barriers versus certified people with impairments, individuals with a record of a special needs, or people who are concerned as having a disability. It prohibits discrimination based upon real or viewed physical or psychological disabilities. It likewise requires employers to offer affordable accommodations to employees who need them due to the fact that of a disability to get a job, perform the essential functions of a job, or take pleasure in the benefits and privileges of work, unless the employer can reveal that unnecessary challenge will result. There are rigorous limitations on when a company can ask disability-related questions or require medical examinations, and all medical details should be dealt with as private. An impairment is defined under the ADA as a mental or physical health condition that "considerably restricts one or more major life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, modified in 1993, guarantee all individuals equivalent rights under the law and detail the damages available to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from using people' hereditary information when making hiring, shooting, job positioning, or promo decisions. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not clearly consist of sexual preference and 29 US states do not explicitly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is incorporated by the law's prohibition of work discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Job Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment protections for LGBT individuals were patchwork; numerous states and regions clearly prohibit harassment and bias in work decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public staff members. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzed Title VII to cover LGBT staff members; the EEOC's figured out that transgender workers were safeguarded under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the defense to incorporate sexual preference in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay individuals have experienced some kind of discrimination and harassment at the office. Moreover, an incredible 90 percent of transgender employees report some form of harassment or mistreatment on the job." Many people in the LGBT community have actually lost their task, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender woman who claims that her boss told her that her existence might make other individuals feel uneasy. [26]
Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and private offices. A couple of more states prohibit LGBT discrimination in only public work environments. [27] Some challengers of these laws think that it would intrude on religious liberty, although these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have also identified that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes also offer substantial defense from employment discrimination. Some laws extend comparable defense as supplied by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws offer higher security to staff members of the state or of state professionals.

The following table lists categories not secured by federal law. Age is consisted of as well, because federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - admission, personal appearance [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]
Civil servant

Title VII likewise uses to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state federal governments have additional defenses versus employment discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not impact task efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually translated this as restricting discrimination on the basis of sexual preference. [91] In June 2009, it was announced that the analysis would be broadened to consist of gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public employees retain their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies deserve to limits staff members' speech in certain ways. [93] Public staff members keep their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]
Federal workers who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) should take legal action against in the correct federal jurisdiction, which presents a various set of issues for plaintiffs.

Exceptions

Authentic occupational qualifications

Employers are usually permitted to think about attributes that would otherwise be prejudiced if they are bona fide occupational certifications (BFOQ). The most typical BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most typical BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that law enforcement monitoring can match races when essential. For example, if cops are running operations that involve personal informants, or undercover agents, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, police departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can think about race-based policing and work with officers that are proportional to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not apply in the entertainment market, such as casting for motion pictures and tv. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting personnel are enabled to cast characters based upon physical characteristics, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, and so on. Employment discrimination declares for Disparate Treatment are rare in the entertainment industry, specifically in performers. [95] This validation is unique to the home entertainment market, and does not move to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, companies will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be an expense reason in wage gaps in between different groups of employees. [96] Cost can be considered when an employer must stabilize privacy and safety interest in the variety of positions that a company are attempting to fill. [96]
Additionally, client preference alone can not be a reason unless there is a personal privacy or security defense. [96] For instance, retail establishments in backwoods can not prohibit African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the client base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that deal with kids survivors of sexual abuse is allowed.

If an employer were trying to prove that employment discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there should be an accurate basis for believing that all or substantially all members of a class would be not able to carry out the task securely and library.kemu.ac.ke efficiently or that it is impractical to determine credentials on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, absence of a malevolent intention does not convert a facially inequitable policy into a neutral policy with a prejudiced effect. [97] Employers also bring the problem to show that a BFOQ is fairly essential, and a lower discriminatory alternative approach does not exist. [98]
Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating individuals differently in their work because of their faith, their spiritual beliefs and practices, and/or their request for lodging (a modification in a workplace rule or policy) of their faiths and practices. It likewise consists of treating individuals differently in their employment since of their lack of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, companies are restricted from refusing to employ a specific based upon their faith- alike race, sex, age, and disability. If an employee believes that they have actually experienced religious discrimination, they ought to resolve this to the supposed culprit. On the other hand, employees are safeguarded by the law for reporting job discrimination and are able to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some areas in the U.S. now have provisions that prohibit discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States provide certain exemptions in these laws to companies or organizations that are religious or religiously-affiliated, however, to varying degrees in different places, depending on the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been maintained and others reversed in time.

The most current and pervasive example of Religious Discrimination is the prevalent rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are using faiths against changing the body and wiki.eqoarevival.com preventative medication as a justification to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not allow staff members to get religious exemptions, or reject their application might be charged by the worker with work discrimination on the basis of religions. However, there are particular requirements for workers to present evidence that it is a seriously held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 clearly allows discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has faced criticism for prohibiting females from serving in combat functions. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was amended to permit them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the article published on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. composes about the method in which black males were dealt with in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites provided the African Americans an opportunity to prove themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic website states, nevertheless, forum.batman.gainedge.org that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were only enabled to work as servants; their participation was limited to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wished to defend the country they lived in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the job rights of individuals who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or particular kinds of service in the National Disaster System. [105] The law likewise prohibits employers from discriminating versus staff members for previous or present involvement or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that give preference to veterans versus non-veterans has been declared to enforce systemic diverse treatment of females due to the fact that there is a huge underrepresentation of females in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually declined this claim due to the fact that there was no discriminatory intent towards ladies in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly victimize a protected classification may still be illegal if they produce a disparate effect on members of a protected group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 restricts employment practices that have a discriminatory impact, unless they relate to task efficiency.

The Act needs the elimination of synthetic, arbitrary, and unneeded barriers to work that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that operates to exclude Negroes can not be revealed to be related to task performance, it is prohibited, notwithstanding the employer's lack of inequitable intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have actually been recognized by the EEOC as having a diverse effect on national origin minorities. [108]
When resisting a disparate impact claim that declares age discrimination, a company, however, does not need to show need; rather, it must just reveal that its practice is reasonable. [citation required]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and imposes the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement arrangements are contained in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its policies and guidelines are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to file fit under Title VII and/or the ADA must tire their administrative solutions by submitting an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to submitting their lawsuit in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs implements Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which restricts discrimination against qualified people with impairments by federal professionals and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and implements its own regulations that apply to its own programs and to any entities that receive monetary assistance. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which prohibits discrimination based on citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) offices play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT work discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against persons with rap sheets in the United States Racial wage gap in the United States Gender pay space in the United States Criticism of credit rating systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in employment". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans workplace predisposition versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the initial on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil liberty Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the initial on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil liberty Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the original on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful inequitable practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in particular activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Chief Law Officer|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [long-term dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in work since of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Tabulation". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [long-term dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Rights Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their hiring practices based upon a Bona Fide Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the initial on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US women in battle". CNN. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the original on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "A Summary of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut). - Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, a lawyer and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to safeguard older employees. Weak to begin with, she specifies that the ADEA has been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court. - Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.