Employment Discrimination Law in The United States

Employment discrimination law in the United States obtains from the typical law, and is codified in numerous state, federal, and local laws. These laws forbid discrimination based on specific attributes or "secured classifications". The United States Constitution likewise forbids discrimination by federal and state federal governments versus their public staff members. Discrimination in the economic sector is not directly constrained by the Constitution, but has ended up being subject to a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal law restricts discrimination in a number of locations, including recruiting, working with, job assessments, promotion policies, training, payment and disciplinary action. State laws often extend protection to additional categories or companies.

Under federal work discrimination law, employers typically can not discriminate against employees on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual preference and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religious beliefs, [1] nationwide origin, [1] special needs (physical or mental, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] bankruptcy or uncollectable bills, [9] hereditary information, [10] and citizenship status (for people, long-term homeowners, short-term homeowners, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not straight attend to work discrimination, but its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to secure federal government employees.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deny people of "life, liberty, or home", without due procedure of the law. It also contains an implicit guarantee that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly restricts states from breaking a person's rights of due process and equivalent protection. In the employment context, these Constitutional provisions would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by treating workers, previous staff members, or job applicants unequally due to the fact that of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due needs that civil servant have a fair procedural procedure before they are ended if the termination is related to a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the clause that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the personal sector is not unconstitutional due to the fact that Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically offer their respective government the power to enact civil liberties laws that use to the economic sector. The Federal government's authority to regulate a private business, consisting of civil rights laws, comes from their power to manage all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically manage some protection from public and private work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions just attend to inequitable treatment by the government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that manage the personal sector are generally Constitutional under the "authorities powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws designed to safeguard public health, safety and morals. All States must abide by the Federal Civil liberty laws, however States may enact civil rights laws that use additional employment defense.

For instance, some State civil rights laws use protection from employment discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, although such types of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has actually developed with time.

The Equal Pay Act amended the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act restricts employers and unions from paying various incomes based on sex. It does not prohibit other discriminatory practices in hiring. It supplies that where workers carry out equal operate in the corner requiring "equal ability, effort, and responsibility and performed under similar working conditions," they should be supplied equivalent pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to companies participated in some aspect of interstate commerce, or all of a company's employees if the business is engaged as a whole in a substantial quantity of interstate commerce. [citation required]
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 restricts discrimination in a lot more elements of the employment relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to a lot of companies engaged in interstate commerce with more than 15 staff members, labor organizations, and employment firms. Title VII restricts discrimination based upon race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it prohibited for companies to discriminate based upon secured attributes concerning terms, conditions, and benefits of employment. Employment service may not discriminate when employing or referring applicants, and labor organizations are also prohibited from basing subscription or union classifications on race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act modified Title VII in 1978, defining that illegal sex discrimination consists of discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "prohibits discrimination by federal specialists and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal contractors". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and changed in 1978 and 1986, prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The prohibited practices are nearly identical to those laid out in Title VII, except that the ADEA secures workers in companies with 20 or more workers instead of 15 or more. An employee is safeguarded from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has phased out and restricted mandatory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that also supply large pensions). The ADEA includes specific standards for advantage, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of a lot of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history beginning with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "developed a policy against age discrimination amongst federal specialists". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 restricts work discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal professionals with agreements of more than $10,000, and programs receiving federal monetary help. [16] It needs affirmative action in addition to non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 requires sensible lodging, and Section 508 requires that electronic and infotech be accessible to handicapped workers. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 restricts discrimination by mine operators versus miners who suffer from "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam period veterans by federal professionals". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or bad financial obligations. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 prohibits companies with more than three staff members from victimizing anybody (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to get rid of discriminatory barriers versus certified individuals with specials needs, individuals with a record of a special needs, or people who are considered having a disability. It prohibits discrimination based on genuine or perceived physical or psychological impairments. It likewise requires employers to provide affordable lodgings to staff members who need them because of a special needs to get a job, perform the vital functions of a task, or delight in the advantages and advantages of employment, unless the company can reveal that unnecessary challenge will result. There are stringent constraints on when a company can ask disability-related questions or require medical exams, and all medical info should be dealt with as confidential. A special needs is specified under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "considerably limits one or more significant life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, changed in 1993, guarantee all individuals equivalent rights under the law and detail the damages available to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from utilizing people' genetic details when making hiring, firing, job positioning, or promotion choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not explicitly include sexual orientation and 29 US states do not clearly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT work discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's restriction of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work protections for LGBT people were patchwork; numerous states and localities clearly forbid harassment and bias in employment decisions on the basis of sexual preference and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translated Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC's figured out that transgender staff members were safeguarded under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the security to encompass sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have actually experienced some type of discrimination and harassment at the workplace. Moreover, a shocking 90 percent of transgender workers report some form of harassment or mistreatment on the job." Many individuals in the LGBT neighborhood have actually lost their job, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who declares that her boss told her that her presence may make other individuals feel uncomfortable. [26]
Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender individuals in both public and private offices. A couple of more states prohibit LGBT discrimination in just public workplaces. [27] Some opponents of these laws believe that it would invade spiritual liberty, even though these laws are focused more on prejudiced actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually likewise determined that these laws do not infringe free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes likewise provide extensive protection from work discrimination. Some laws extend comparable protection as supplied by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply defense to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws supply higher security to staff members of the state or of state specialists.

The following table lists classifications not safeguarded by federal law. Age is included as well, given that federal law just covers workers over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - matriculation, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Place of birth [76]
Government staff members

Title VII likewise uses to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state governments have extra securities against work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 restricts discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not affect task efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually analyzed this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual preference. [91] In June 2009, it was announced that the analysis would be broadened to consist of gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public workers maintain their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies can limits staff members' speech in certain ways. [93] Public staff members retain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a private resident (not on behalf of their company), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]
Federal staff members who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) should take legal action against in the proper federal jurisdiction, which poses a different set of problems for plaintiffs.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are normally permitted to think about characteristics that would otherwise be discriminatory if they are authentic occupational certifications (BFOQ). The most typical BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most common BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this guideline is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that law enforcement monitoring can match races when needed. For instance, if authorities are running operations that involve personal informants, or undercover representatives, sending an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, cops departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can think about race-based policing and hire officers that are proportional to the community's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not apply in the entertainment market, such as casting for movies and television. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting personnel are permitted to cast characters based upon physical attributes, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are unusual in the show business, specifically in performers. [95] This reason is distinct to the entertainment market, and does not move to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, companies will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory employment discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost validation in wage spaces in between different groups of employees. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company must balance personal privacy and safety interest in the variety of positions that a company are attempting to fill. [96]
Additionally, client choice alone can not be a reason unless there is a privacy or security defense. [96] For example, retail establishments in backwoods can not prohibit African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the consumer base. But, matching genders for staffing at facilities that manage kids survivors of sexual assault is allowed.

If a company were attempting to prove that work discrimination was based upon a BFOQ, there must be a factual basis for believing that all or considerably all members of a class would be unable to perform the job securely and effectively or that it is impractical to figure out qualifications on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a malevolent motive does not convert a facially prejudiced policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory effect. [97] Employers also bring the problem to show that a BFOQ is reasonably required, and employment a lower prejudiced option approach does not exist. [98]
Religious employment discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating individuals differently in their employment since of their religion, their spiritual beliefs and practices, and/or their ask for lodging (a modification in a work environment guideline or policy) of their religions and practices. It likewise consists of dealing with individuals in a different way in their work due to the fact that of their lack of religious belief or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, companies are forbidden from refusing to employ a private based on their faith- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If a worker thinks that they have actually experienced spiritual discrimination, they ought to address this to the supposed transgressor. On the other hand, staff members are protected by the law for reporting job discrimination and have the ability to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some locations in the U.S. now have provisions that ban discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States offer certain exemptions in these laws to businesses or institutions that are religious or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to varying degrees in different areas, depending on the setting and the context; some of these have actually been supported and others reversed in time.

The most recent and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the widespread rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many staff members are using faiths against altering the body and preventative medication as a reason to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not permit staff members to obtain spiritual exemptions, or reject their application may be charged by the worker with employment discrimination on the basis of spiritual beliefs. However, there are specific requirements for staff members to present evidence that it is a regards held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 clearly permits discrimination versus members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has actually faced criticism for restricting women from serving in battle functions. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was changed to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the post posted on the PBS site, Henry Louis Gates Jr. composes about the method which black guys were dealt with in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites provided the African Americans an opportunity to show themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic site states, however, that when black soldiers joined the Navy, they were just permitted to work as servants; their participation was restricted to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wished to defend the country they lived in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the task rights of people who willingly or involuntarily leave employment positions to undertake military service or certain kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law also forbids employers from victimizing employees for past or present participation or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that provide choice to veterans versus non-veterans has been declared to enforce systemic diverse treatment of females because there is a vast underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually declined this claim due to the fact that there was no prejudiced intent towards ladies in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not straight discriminate versus a secured category may still be illegal if they produce a diverse impact on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits work practices that have a discriminatory effect, unless they are associated to job performance.

The Act needs the removal of synthetic, arbitrary, and unneeded barriers to employment that operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that operates to omit Negroes can not be shown to be connected to job efficiency, it is forbidden, notwithstanding the employer's absence of inequitable intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have been determined by the EEOC as having a disparate effect on national origin minorities. [108]
When resisting a disparate impact claim that declares age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not require to show requirement; rather, it must simply show that its practice is reasonable. [citation needed]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interprets and imposes the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement arrangements are consisted of in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its guidelines and guidelines are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to file match under Title VII and/or the ADA need to tire their administrative solutions by filing an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to filing their suit in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs implements Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which restricts discrimination against qualified people with impairments by federal professionals and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and implements its own guidelines that apply to its own programs and to any entities that receive financial support. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which forbids discrimination based on citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT employment discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against individuals with criminal records in the United States Racial wage gap in the United States Gender pay space in the United States Criticism of credit rating systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the initial on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in employment". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans work environment predisposition versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the initial on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the initial on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the original on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful inequitable practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination against the engagement in particular activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Liberty Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Attorney General|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [long-term dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of employers". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with regard to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or viewed HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment due to the fact that of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [long-term dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Rights Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their working with practices based upon an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Authentic Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Get prepared for more US females in fight". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the original on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Job Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Leading to the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the original on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the initial on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "An Introduction of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the initial on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut). - Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, a lawyer and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to safeguard older employees. Weak to start with, she mentions that the ADEA has actually been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court. - Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.