Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says

Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to offer it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a little but feisty 14 Billion specification model, our AI is boldly forecasting the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to answer humankind's hardest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pressing questions that are less easy to select. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some interesting improvements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is really on the smaller side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months back so we have developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified territory to make its finest forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We presented the following questions to our AI and determined its response. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll look at the essential points from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, historydb.date public relationship, and higgledy-piggledy.xyz Taylor has actually even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.

Some fans are delighted, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the odds and his reactions recommend it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, possibly around 5%, considering all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend what precisely a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it appears like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is quite high. ... I likewise need to think of the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are aware of the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than 5 seems like a substantial number however possible given their confidence, I would approximate a possibility around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the method, and the likelihood that they'll use it a number of times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears considerable due to the fact that it reveals he's done it in the past, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more current articles, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could imply he's less likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a fight with Drake, which might offer him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so possibly he bewares about including any questionable songs in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar may feel obliged to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a risk that such material may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making vibrant proceed big stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime program, which may provide him more creative liberty. Plus, his previous behavior recommends he's not shy about revealing his opinions, even in public efficiencies.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, present shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the event's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, surgiteams.com possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to trigger offense and that he actually discovered it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article specifically about his love for food, which recommends that he's a person who delights in eating, particularly with his group. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the situation is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 incredibly bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and believes anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historical data that may influence this forecast.

First, I check out the posts supplied. They all discuss the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has actually come up regularly than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a small edge, but it's not a huge distinction.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making predictions, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should consider whether this historic predisposition must affect the possibility.

After thinking about it, I decide that while the historic data reveals a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically considerable enough to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists however doesn't override the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely believe the exact same. BUT, its official now due to the fact that our AI states the chances are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite severe allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that speak about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful contact recent games, especially the AFC National championship. That does seem to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get frustrated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "outrageous." They say there's no proof of organized bias. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it may suggest there's no real basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have been penalized more since 2022. That's fascinating due to the fact that if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't dismiss every possibility, however incredibly unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth enjoying the video game still? I think I'll need to wait and see how the video game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was wrong about whatever, at least it can gain from this.