Employment Discrimination Law in The United States

Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the common law, and is codified in many state, federal, and local laws. These laws prohibit discrimination based upon particular characteristics or "safeguarded classifications". The United States Constitution also prohibits discrimination by federal and state governments against their public workers. Discrimination in the economic sector is not directly constrained by the Constitution, however has actually become based on a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law prohibits discrimination in a number of locations, consisting of recruiting, working with, job assessments, promotion policies, training, payment and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend defense to extra categories or employers.

Under federal employment discrimination law, employers generally can not victimize employees on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] faith, [1] nationwide origin, [1] disability (physical or psychological, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills, [9] genetic details, [10] and citizenship status (for people, irreversible citizens, temporary locals, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not straight attend to employment discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have actually been held to protect federal civil servant.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has an explicit requirement that the federal government does not deny people of "life, liberty, or residential or commercial property", without due procedure of the law. It also consists of an implicit assurance that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly forbids states from violating a person's rights of due process and equivalent security. In the work context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by dealing with workers, former workers, or task applicants unequally because of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process security needs that federal government employees have a reasonable procedural process before they are terminated if the termination is connected to a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the stipulation that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination expenses (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional due to the fact that Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly provide their particular government the power to enact civil liberties laws that apply to the economic sector. The Federal federal government's authority to regulate a personal service, including civil rights laws, comes from their power to regulate all commerce between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly afford some security from public and personal employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions just attend to inequitable treatment by the government, including a public employer.

Absent of a provision in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that regulate the personal sector are generally Constitutional under the "cops powers" teaching or the power of a State to enact laws created to secure public health, security and morals. All States must comply with the Federal Civil Rights laws, however States may enact civil rights laws that provide extra work security.

For example, some State civil liberties laws offer security from work discrimination on the basis of political association, despite the fact that such forms of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has developed in time.

The Equal Pay Act changed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is imposed by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits companies and unions from paying various earnings based on sex. It does not prohibit other discriminatory practices in hiring. It provides that where employees carry out equal work in the corner needing "equivalent skill, effort, and responsibility and performed under similar working conditions," they must be provided equivalent pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to employers engaged in some element of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's workers if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a significant amount of interstate commerce. [citation required]
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts discrimination in a lot more aspects of the work relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Job opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to most employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 staff members, labor organizations, and work agencies. Title VII restricts discrimination based on race, color, religious beliefs, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it prohibited for employers to discriminate based upon protected characteristics concerning terms, conditions, and advantages of work. Employment service might not discriminate when employing or referring candidates, and labor organizations are likewise restricted from basing membership or union classifications on race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII in 1978, defining that unlawful sex discrimination consists of discrimination based upon pregnancy, giving birth, and related medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "restricts discrimination by federal professionals and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal professionals". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and amended in 1978 and 1986, forbids employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The prohibited practices are almost similar to those detailed in Title VII, except that the ADEA protects workers in companies with 20 or more employees rather than 15 or more. An employee is safeguarded from discrimination based on age if he or she is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has phased out and restricted compulsory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that also offer large pensions). The ADEA consists of explicit standards for benefit, pension and retirement strategies. [7] Though ADEA is the center of the majority of discussion of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history beginning with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "developed a policy versus age discrimination among federal specialists". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal professionals with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal financial assistance. [16] It requires affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs reasonable accommodation, employment and Section 508 requires that electronic and information innovation be accessible to disabled workers. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 prohibits discrimination by mine operators versus miners who suffer from "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam era veterans by federal specialists". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 restricts employers with more than three workers from victimizing anyone (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to remove inequitable barriers versus certified people with disabilities, individuals with a record of an impairment, or individuals who are considered as having an impairment. It restricts discrimination based on real or perceived physical or psychological disabilities. It likewise requires companies to offer affordable lodgings to employees who need them since of a special needs to make an application for a task, carry out the essential functions of a task, or enjoy the advantages and benefits of employment, unless the employer can reveal that undue difficulty will result. There are strict restrictions on when a company can ask disability-related concerns or need medical exams, and all medical details should be treated as private. A special needs is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "substantially restricts several major life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Liberty Acts, changed in 1993, make sure all individuals equivalent rights under the law and lay out the damages available to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from utilizing individuals' genetic details when making hiring, firing, task positioning, or promo choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not clearly consist of sexual preference and 29 US states do not clearly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's restriction of work discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Job Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work defenses for LGBT people were patchwork; a number of states and regions explicitly restrict harassment and bias in employment choices on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translated Title VII to cover LGBT workers; the EEOC's figured out that transgender staff members were secured under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the protection to encompass sexual preference in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay individuals have experienced some form of discrimination and harassment at the office. Moreover, a shocking 90 percent of transgender employees report some type of harassment or mistreatment on the job." Many people in the LGBT community have actually lost their task, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender woman who claims that her boss told her that her presence may make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]
Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender individuals in both public and private work environments. A few more states ban LGBT discrimination in only public work environments. [27] Some opponents of these laws believe that it would invade religious liberty, despite the fact that these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have also recognized that these laws do not infringe complimentary speech or religious liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes also supply extensive protection from employment discrimination. Some laws extend similar security as offered by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes provide defense to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws offer higher protection to workers of the state or of state specialists.

The following table lists classifications not protected by federal law. Age is included as well, considering that federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - enlisting, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]
Civil servant

Title VII also uses to state, federal, local and other public staff members. Employees of federal and state federal governments have extra protections versus employment discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 restricts discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not impact task performance. The Office of Personnel Management has actually translated this as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual preference. [91] In June 2009, it was announced that the interpretation would be broadened to include gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public workers maintain their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies have the right to limitations workers' speech in specific methods. [93] Public employees retain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their company), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]
Federal staff members who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) need to take legal action against in the correct federal jurisdiction, which poses a various set of problems for plaintiffs.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are typically enabled to consider attributes that would otherwise be inequitable if they are authentic occupational qualifications (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most typical BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this guideline is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that law enforcement security can match races when required. For example, if cops are running operations that include confidential informants, or undercover representatives, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, cops departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and work with officers that are in proportion to the community's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not use in the show business, such as casting for movies and tv. [95] Directors, producers and employment casting staff are permitted to cast characters based upon physical attributes, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination declares for Disparate Treatment are unusual in the show business, specifically in performers. [95] This justification is special to the show business, and does not move to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, companies will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be an expense justification in between various groups of staff members. [96] Cost can be considered when a company should balance personal privacy and security worry about the variety of positions that a company are trying to fill. [96]
Additionally, consumer choice alone can not be a reason unless there is a privacy or security defense. [96] For instance, retail establishments in backwoods can not forbid African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the client base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that handle kids survivors of sexual abuse is allowed.

If a company were attempting to prove that work discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there need to be a factual basis for thinking that all or significantly all members of a class would be unable to perform the task safely and efficiently or that it is not practical to determine certifications on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, absence of a malevolent intention does not convert a facially discriminatory policy into a neutral policy with a prejudiced result. [97] Employers likewise carry the problem to show that a BFOQ is reasonably required, and a lesser inequitable alternative method does not exist. [98]
Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating people differently in their employment since of their religious beliefs, their religious beliefs and practices, and/or their demand for accommodation (a change in an office rule or policy) of their faiths and practices. It also consists of dealing with people in a different way in their work due to the fact that of their absence of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, companies are restricted from declining to work with a specific based upon their religion- alike race, sex, age, employment and disability. If an employee thinks that they have experienced spiritual discrimination, they ought to resolve this to the alleged culprit. On the other hand, workers are safeguarded by the law for reporting task discrimination and have the ability to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some locations in the U.S. now have clauses that ban discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States provide certain exemptions in these laws to companies or institutions that are religious or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to differing degrees in various locations, depending on the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been promoted and others reversed over time.

The most recent and pervasive example of Religious Discrimination is the extensive rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are utilizing spiritual beliefs versus modifying the body and preventative medicine as a reason to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not allow staff members to request spiritual exemptions, or decline their application may be charged by the staff member with work discrimination on the basis of faiths. However, there are particular requirements for employees to present proof that it is a truly held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 explicitly permits discrimination versus members of the Communist Party.

Military

The military has faced criticism for forbiding females from serving in combat roles. In 2016, however, the law was amended to permit them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the post published on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. composes about the way in which black males were treated in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites offered the African Americans an opportunity to prove themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic website states, however, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were only enabled to work as servants; their involvement was limited to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wanted to defend the nation they lived in, they were denied the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the task rights of people who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or specific types of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law also prohibits companies from discriminating versus staff members for previous or present involvement or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer preference to veterans versus non-veterans has been alleged to impose systemic disparate treatment of ladies since there is a large underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has declined this claim since there was no inequitable intent towards women in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not straight discriminate versus a secured classification might still be illegal if they produce a diverse effect on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids employment practices that have an inequitable effect, unless they belong to job efficiency.

The Act requires the removal of artificial, arbitrary, and unneeded barriers to work that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to exclude Negroes can not be revealed to be related to job efficiency, it is restricted, notwithstanding the employer's lack of prejudiced intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have actually been determined by the EEOC as having a disparate effect on national origin minorities. [108]
When defending versus a diverse effect claim that declares age discrimination, a company, however, does not need to demonstrate need; rather, it needs to just reveal that its practice is affordable. [citation required]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and enforces the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement arrangements are contained in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its regulations and guidelines are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to file fit under Title VII and/or the ADA need to tire their administrative solutions by filing an administrative problem with the EEOC prior to filing their suit in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs imposes Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which forbids discrimination versus certified people with specials needs by federal specialists and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each agency has and imposes its own regulations that apply to its own programs and to any entities that get monetary help. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which forbids discrimination based upon citizenship status or national origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces take the function of the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT employment discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination versus individuals with criminal records in the United States Racial wage gap in the United States Gender pay space in the United States Criticism of credit rating systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the initial on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits office bias versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the initial on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil liberty Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the initial on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the initial on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the original on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful inequitable practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination against the engagement in specific activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Attorney General|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [long-term dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the original on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the initial on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of employers". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment because of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Tabulation". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [long-term dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their employing practices based upon an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Authentic Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US ladies in combat". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Leading to the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the original on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "A Summary of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut). - Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, a lawyer and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to secure older workers. Weak to start with, she specifies that the ADEA has actually been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court. - Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.